Alexis Canter vs Nikola Slavic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Oct at 02:02 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Canter vs N. Slavic

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Canter 1 - 0 Slavic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Alexis Canter winning 2 and Nikola Slavic winning 1. The last match between Alexis Canter and Nikola Slavic was at the M25 Glasgow, 27-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 2-6 7-6(5) 11-9.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Canter | 1 |
| Slavic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Glasgow(10-27-25)
A. Canter vs N. Slavic H2H Profile
A. Canter vs N. Slavic Match Preview:
- Nikola Slavic has recently won 45.86% of second serve points, compared to 39.74% for Alexis Canter. Does this suggest an edge for Slavic? Yes, given the high correlation between second serves and match outcomes.
- In return games, Slavic captures 44.75% of opponents' second serve points, while Canter is at 40.10%. How do their first serve return stats compare? Slavic's is slightly lower at 24.07% vs. Canter's 25.57%.
- Pressure situations reveal Slavic saves 56.74% of breakpoints versus Canter’s 49.38%. Would you say Slavic handles pressure better? Indeed, this stat favors Slavic in tight situations.
- Over the past year, Slavic has a higher match win rate at 65.75%, compared to Canter's 58.33%. What does this indicate? Slavic's overall performance appears stronger.
- Slavic excels on indoor hard courts (63% win rate), while Canter's best surface is hard (63%). What about their weaker surfaces? Slavic struggles on hard courts (52%), whereas Canter finds grass challenging (33%).
- Both players compete predominantly at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, but Slavic wins 66.67% of matches, outperforming Canter's 58.82%. How might playing level influence this matchup? Slavic's higher win rate at this level is notable.
- Examining opponent quality, Slavic faces an average rank of 242.07, while Canter engages with stronger opponents, averaging a rank of 191.75. Does this give Canter an experience edge? Potentially, due to facing tougher competition.
- In deciding sets, Canter has a 70% win rate compared to Slavic’s 55%. Does Canter perform better in critical match moments? Yes, suggesting he might have the upper hand if the match goes the distance.
- Remember to also consider current event performance as it may reveal a player’s in-form status, which can impact predictions. Historic event performance might also be a factor.
Editorial Prediction (October 27, 2025, UTC):
Nikola Slavic's second serve prowess and adeptness at handling breakpoint situations suggest a strategic advantage. His impressive win rate this past year further underscores his competitive edge.
Despite Alexis Canter's experience against higher-ranked opponents and skill in deciding set scenarios, Slavic's recent form and pressure-playing abilities are compelling.
While Canter could capitalize if the match extends to a deciding set, the overall analysis leans toward Slavic. Consequently, Nikola Slavic is most likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis clash.
Alexis Canter vs Nikola Slavic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Canter vs N. Slavic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Recent Performance Stats
A. Canter Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 5-7 6-2 7-6(4) | ||
Q3 | W | 2-6 7-6(5) 11-9 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 5-7 10-8 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
N. Slavic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||

A. Canter vs N. Slavic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.67% (216/202) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.73% (74/52) |
| 51.93% (484/448) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.34% (164/122) |
| 51.23% (4577/4358) | Games Win/Loss | 53.37% (1416/1237) |
| 54.48% (146/122) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.17% (12/11) |
| 46.67% (7/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (36/24) |
| 48.33% (58/62) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.47% (26/17) |
| 33.33% (5/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 810 | Aces Total | 354 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 488 | Total Double Faults | 171 |
| 1:8:14 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 325.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 277.2 |
| 63% (11430/18127) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2900/4583) |
| 67% (7630/11430) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (2026/2900) |
| 49% (3265/6697) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (823/1683) |
| 41% (595/1460) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (177/433) |
| 37% (6438/17427) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1742/4576) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 23.08% (3/10) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.59% (213/192) | Futures W/L | 59.68% (74/50) |
| 52% (214/415) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (74/126) |
| 52% (51/99) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 37% (10/27) |
| 45% (45/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (18/34) |
| 85% (223/190) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (72/63) |
| 15% (223/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (72/9) |
| 13% (195/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (54/11) |